Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 12: 843463, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1779935

RESUMEN

Background: Since the outbreak of COVID-19, a series of preventive and control measures in China have been used to effectively curb the spread of COVID-19. This study aimed to analyze the epidemiological characteristics of Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) and Chlamydia pneumoniae (CP) in hospitalized children with acute respiratory tract infection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: MP IgM antibody and CP IgM antibody were detected in all hospitalized children due to acute respiratory tract infection in the Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University from January 2019 to December 2020. These data were compared between 2019 and 2020 based on age and month. Results: The overall detection rate of MP and CP in 2020 was significantly lower than that in 2019 (MP: 21.5% vs 32.9%, P<0.001; CP: 0.3% vs 0.9%, P<0.001). This study found a 4-fold reduction in the number of children positive for MP and a 7.5-fold reduction in the number of children positive for CP from 2019 to 2020. The positive cases were concentrated in children aged >1 year old. In 2019, the positive rate of MP was detected more commonly in children 3 years of age or older than in younger children. In 2020, the higher positive rate of MP reached a peak in the 3- to 6-year age group (35.3%). CP was detected predominantly in children aged 6 years older in 2019 and 2020, with positive rates of 4.8% and 2.6%, respectively. Meanwhile, the positive rates of MP in 2019 were detected more commonly in July, August and September, with 47.2%, 46.7% and 46.3%, respectively. Nevertheless, the positive rates of MP from February to December 2020 apparently decreased compared to those in 2019. The positive rates of CP were evenly distributed throughout the year, with 0.5%-1.6% in 2019 and 0.0%-2.1% in 2020. Conclusions: A series of preventive and control measures for SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic can not only contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2 but also sharply improve the infection of other atypical pathogens, including MP and CP.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por Chlamydophila , Chlamydophila pneumoniae , Neumonía por Mycoplasma , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Niño Hospitalizado , Infecciones por Chlamydophila/epidemiología , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina M , Lactante , Mycoplasma pneumoniae , Pandemias , Neumonía por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , Neumonía por Mycoplasma/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2
2.
J Med Virol ; 94(1): 303-309, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1544346

RESUMEN

Emerging evidence shows co-infection with atypical bacteria in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Respiratory illness caused by atypical bacteria such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila may show overlapping manifestations and imaging features with COVID-19 causing clinical and laboratory diagnostic issues. We conducted a prospective study to identify co-infections with SARS-CoV-2 and atypical bacteria in an Indian tertiary hospital. From June 2020 to January 2021, a total of 194 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were also tested for atypical bacterial pathogens. For diagnosing M. pneumoniae, a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay and serology (IgM ELISA) were performed. C. pneumoniae diagnosis was made based on IgM serology. L. pneumophila diagnosis was based on PCR or urinary antigen testing. Clinical and epidemiological features of SARS-CoV-2 and atypical bacteria-positive and -negative patient groups were compared. Of the 194 patients admitted with COVID-19, 17 (8.8%) were also diagnosed with M. pneumoniae (n = 10) or C. pneumoniae infection (n = 7). Confusion, headache, and bilateral infiltrate were found more frequently in the SARS CoV-2 and atypical bacteria co-infection group. Patients in the M. pneumoniae or C. pneumoniae co-infection group were more likely to develop ARDS, required ventilatory support, had a longer hospital length of stay, and higher fatality rate compared to patients with only SARS-CoV-2. Our report highlights co-infection with bacteria causing atypical pneumonia should be considered in patients with SARS-CoV-2 depending on the clinical context. Timely identification of co-existing pathogens can provide pathogen-targeted treatment and prevent fatal outcomes of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the current pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Formas Bacterianas Atípicas/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19/patología , Infecciones por Chlamydophila/epidemiología , Coinfección/epidemiología , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/epidemiología , Neumonía por Mycoplasma/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Chlamydophila pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , India , Legionella pneumophila/aislamiento & purificación , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mycoplasma pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA